Loss & Dissipation ====================== Loss & Dissipation Parameters: Dielectric, surface, radiation, and junction loss channels identified and weighted by EPR participations A. Dielectric Loss (Bulk & Surface) .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 * - Parameter - Symbol - Unit - Description - Optimal / Best Value - Good Range - Acceptable Range - Poor / Worst Value - Physical Significance * - Bulk Substrate Loss Tangent - tan delta_bulk - dimensionless - Intrinsic dielectric loss of the substrate material (Si, sapphire, SiO2); weighted by bulk EPR participation. - < 1×10⁻⁷ (Si, sapphire) - < 1×10⁻⁶ - 1×10⁻⁶ – 1×10⁻⁵ - > 1×10⁻⁴ - Silicon and sapphire are preferred substrates; amorphous SiO2 has tan δ ~ 10⁻³ (very poor). * - Metal-Substrate Interface Loss - tan delta_MS - dimensionless - Effective loss tangent of metal–substrate (MS) two-level system (TLS) interface layer. - < 1×10⁻³ - < 3×10⁻³ - 3×10⁻³ – 1×10⁻² - > 5×10⁻² - MS interface is typically 2–5 nm thick oxide layer; dominant loss in many planar qubits. * - Substrate-Air Interface Loss - tan delta_SA - dimensionless - Effective loss tangent of substrate–air (SA) interface; due to adsorbed surface oxides and organics. - < 3×10⁻³ - < 1×10⁻² - 1×10⁻² – 5×10⁻² - > 0.1 - Cleaning and surface passivation reduce SA loss; participation ratio from EPR isolates this channel. * - Metal-Air Interface Loss - tan delta_MA - dimensionless - Effective loss tangent of metal–air (MA) interface; native oxide on superconducting film top surface. - < 3×10⁻³ - < 1×10⁻² - 1×10⁻² – 5×10⁻² - > 0.1 - Nb and Al form native oxides; replacing top surface with clean metal reduces MA loss. * - Surface Participation Ratio (MS) - p_MS - dimensionless - Fraction of electric field energy in metal-substrate interface region; computed from EPR E-field. - < 5×10⁻⁴ - < 2×10⁻³ - 2×10⁻³ – 1×10⁻² - > 5×10⁻² - Thinner gaps increase p_MS; EPR identifies geometry changes to reduce interface participation. * - TLS-Limited Quality Factor (1/f) - Q_TLS - dimensionless - Quality factor limited by two-level system (TLS) bath; power- and temperature-dependent. - > 3×10⁶ - 10⁶ – 3×10⁶ - 10⁵ – 10⁶ - < 10⁴ - Q_TLS improves with high drive power (TLS saturation); EPR participations give TLS contribution breakdown. B. Radiation & Geometry Loss .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 * - Parameter - Symbol - Unit - Description - Optimal / Best Value - Good Range - Acceptable Range - Poor / Worst Value - Physical Significance * - Radiation Loss Rate - gamma_rad / 2pi - kHz - Energy loss due to electromagnetic radiation from non-closed geometry; computed by EPR from far-field. - < 1 kHz - < 10 kHz - 10 – 100 kHz - > 500 kHz - Open transmission line stubs or poorly designed ground planes lead to radiation loss. * - Seam Loss (3D cavities) - gamma_seam / 2pi - kHz - Loss at mechanical seam between cavity halves; critical for 3D transmon and fluxonium devices. - < 1 kHz - < 5 kHz - 5 – 50 kHz - > 200 kHz - EPR current participation at seam predicts seam loss; improved by indium bonding or tight tolerances. * - Quasiparticle Loss Rate - gamma_qp / 2pi - kHz - Qubit decay due to nonequilibrium quasiparticles tunneling across junction. - < 2 kHz - < 20 kHz - 20 – 100 kHz - > 500 kHz - Quasiparticle poisoning is stochastic; mitigated by gap engineering and quasiparticle traps. * - Vortex Loss (in-field operation) - gamma_vortex / 2pi - kHz - Loss from magnetic vortices in superconducting film when operated in residual magnetic field. - < 1 kHz (< 1 µT shield) - < 10 kHz - 10 – 100 kHz - > 500 kHz - Mitigated by magnetic shielding and moat structures; EPR current maps identify vortex-sensitive areas. * - Conductor (Ohmic) Loss - gamma_ohm / 2pi - kHz - Residual ohmic loss from non-superconducting regions or above Tc contributions; usually negligible in Al. - < 0.1 kHz - < 1 kHz - 1 – 10 kHz - > 100 kHz - Typically negligible at mK temperatures; relevant for normal-metal contacts or resistive wirebonds.