Simulation Convergence ====================== Simulation Convergence & Accuracy Metrics: eigenmode simulation quality indicators for reliable EPR extraction A. Eigenmode Solver Convergence .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 * - Parameter - Symbol - Unit - Description - Optimal / Best Value - Good Range - Acceptable Range - Poor / Worst Value - Physical Significance * - Eigenfrequency Convergence ΔFreq - Delta f / f - ppm - Relative change in eigenfrequency between successive mesh refinement passes. - < 5 ppm - < 50 ppm - 50 – 500 ppm - > 1000 ppm - EPR frequencies directly set qubit and resonator values; poor convergence propagates to all outputs. * - Energy Error (Maxwell equations) - Delta U / U - % - Relative error in total electromagnetic energy from adaptive mesh refinement. - < 0.1% - < 0.5% - 0.5 – 2% - > 5% - Energy error directly bounds participation ratio error; must be minimised for accurate loss prediction. * - Tetrahedral Mesh Count - N_mesh - thousands - Number of tetrahedra in adaptive mesh; convergence criterion, not absolute target. - 200 – 2000k - 50 – 200k - 10 – 50k - < 5k - Too few → inaccurate fields, especially at thin features (junctions, gaps); too many → slow. * - Number of Eigenmode Passes - N_passes - integer - Adaptive refinement passes until convergence criterion is met. - 10 – 20 passes - 7 – 10 passes - 4 – 6 passes - < 3 passes - Insufficient passes leave mesh unrefined in critical regions (junction vicinity, surface gaps). * - Mode Participation Sum Check - sum p - dimensionless - Sum of EPR participations across all modes; should equal 1 for each junction. - 0.99 – 1.01 - 0.97 – 1.03 - 0.93 – 1.07 - < 0.90 or > 1.10 - Deviation indicates missing eigenmodes, disconnected networks, or mesh error in junction volume. * - Participation Ratio Repeatability - sigma_p / p - % - Run-to-run relative standard deviation of participation ratios across identical simulations. - < 0.5% - < 2% - 2 – 5% - > 10% - Poor repeatability indicates stochastic mesh seeding issues; use fixed seed and fine mesh. B. Loss Analysis Simulation Quality .. list-table:: :header-rows: 1 * - Parameter - Symbol - Unit - Description - Optimal / Best Value - Good Range - Acceptable Range - Poor / Worst Value - Physical Significance * - Surface Participation Error - Delta p_surf - % - Relative error in surface (interface) participation ratio from finite mesh at thin layers. - < 2% - < 5% - 5 – 15% - > 20% - Thin oxide layers (2–5 nm) require extremely fine mesh; often estimated analytically. * - Junction Volume Definition Accuracy - Delta V_J / V_J - % - Relative accuracy of the junction geometric volume used to compute junction participation. - < 1% - < 5% - 5 – 10% - > 20% - Junction volume error directly maps to participation ratio error; critical CAD accuracy needed. * - Number of Loss Regions Modelled - N_regions - integer - Number of distinct lossy material regions (interfaces) explicitly included in the EPR model. - = 4 (MS, SA, MA, bulk) - 3 - 2 - 1 (bulk only) - Modelling only bulk misses dominant surface/interface losses in planar devices. * - Frequency Band of Validity - BW_valid - GHz - Frequency range over which the extracted Hamiltonian parameters are valid (no spurious modes). - 0 – 15 GHz (no spurious) - 0 – 10 GHz - 5 – 10 GHz only - Spurious modes present - Spurious modes can hybridize with qubit and resonator, invalidating EPR sums.