Simulation Convergence Metrics

Numerical-quality checks for adaptive passes, mesh size, energy error, S-parameter

convergence, and RAM use.

#

VER ID

Parameter

Severity

Design Rule / Constraint

Ideal / Optimal Value

Acceptable Range

Good

Bad

Why It Matters

48

HFSS-V-001

Delta S Convergence (ΔS)

Critical

ΔS < 0.002 (max |S-matrix change| between passes)

< 0.001

0.001 – 0.005

< 0.001: S-parameters converged to 3rd decimal place; Q-factor reliable

to ±1%

> 0.01: S-parameters still shifting; Q and coupling coefficients

unreliable

Primary HFSS convergence criterion. Maximum change in S-parameter matrix

between successive adaptive mesh refinement passes.

49

HFSS-V-002

Adaptive Pass Count

Medium

Converge within 6 – 15 adaptive passes

6 – 12 passes

6 – 25 passes

6–12 passes: efficient meshing; geometry well-suited to HFSS basis functions

> 40 passes without convergence: poorly conditioned geometry or material

error; abort and review

Number of mesh refinement iterations to reach ΔS criterion. Many passes

indicates difficult geometry or incorrect material setup.

50

HFSS-V-003

Mesh Element Count

Medium

10,000 – 500,000 tetrahedra for typical qubit geometry

20k – 100k

10k – 500k

20k–100k: sufficient resolution for junction, pad, and resonator without

excessive RAM

> 1,000,000: direct solver RAM > 256 GB; iterative solver with lower

accuracy required

Total finite-element mesh size. Under-meshed → inaccurate fields;

over-meshed → excessive compute cost and RAM.

51

HFSS-V-004

Energy Error Δε/ε

High

Energy error < 0.5% (relative stored energy error)

< 0.2 %

0.2 – 1 %

< 0.2%: field solution accurate; participation ratios and Q-factors

reliable to < 1%

> 2%: field solution inaccurate; EPR and loss calculations may be off by

> 10%

Relative error in total stored electromagnetic energy. Low energy error

confirms accurate field solutions and Q-factor extraction.

52

HFSS-V-005

Simulation RAM Usage

Low

Peak RAM < 64 GB for standard qubit simulation

< 16 GB

16 – 64 GB

< 16 GB: fits standard workstation; direct solver; fastest and most

accurate

> 128 GB: requires HPC cluster; iterative solver fallback; convergence

harder

RAM required for direct matrix solver. Excess forces iterative solver with

lower accuracy and convergence risk.